df  

©2000-2010 Village Of
Plover
Designed & Maintained By
The Village of Plover

Public Works Committee Meeting
Monday, July 19, 2010
5:10 p.m.


Members Present: Fred La Rosa, Steve Fritz, Orv Damrau
Members Excused: Al Tessmann

Others Present: Dan Schlutter, Dan Mahoney, Bill Konkol Debbie Sniadajewski, Tom Davies, Joe Radomski, David Hansen, Bruce Gerland

1. Mr. La Rosa called the meeting to order at 5:11 p.m.

2. Mr. Damrau moved to approve the minutes of the meeting of June 14, 2010 as printed. Mr. Fritz seconded and the motion carried.

3. There was no one present wishing to address the Committee.

4. Mr. Damrau moved to approve the vouchers as listed. Mr. Fritz seconded and the motion carried.

5. REVIEW AND POSSIBLE APPROVAL OF AECOM RECOMMENDATION ON RIVER DR. SIDEWALK LOCATION BETWEEN FOREMOST RD. AND COOLIDGE AVE.
Mr. Mahoney stated that the Village has received several requests for a sidewalk in the River Dr. area. He explained that the existing TIF District and the 2010 Street Reconstruction fund are sources that would be used to finance a sidewalk on River Dr. and that special assessments would not be levied against property owners. The Village's current policy is to maintain sidewalks including snow removal and there are no plans to change the policy. AECOM was hired to design concrete sidewalk on River Dr. between Foremost Dr. and Coolidge Ave. and on River's Edge Dr. south of River Dr. and an asphalt path on Grant Ave.

Bruce Gerland, AECOM, discussed the existing right-of-way on River Dr. and the impact of a sidewalk. He discussed the reasons behind their recommendation to locate the sidewalk on the south side of River Dr.; the river on the north side being adjacent to River Dr. for 700 feet being a safety hazard; pedestrian safety in that the majority of residents in the area are located on the south side of River Dr. thus eliminating the need to cross River Dr.; existing telephone poles are located on the north side of River Dr.; tree removal on the south side of River Dr. involves trees that are already dead, whereas they are alive on the north side; the majority of utilities are located on the south side, however, they are generally buried 24 to 36 inches deep and a sidewalk/swales will be approximately 1 foot and will have minimal impact on the utilities. Mr. Gerland discussed the location of the Grant Ave. path on the east side of the roadway and the River's Edge Dr. sidewalk also being located on the east side.

Marie Rossier, 4031 River Dr. questioned how wide the sidewalk would be on River Dr. Mr. Gerland stated it would be a 6 foot wide concrete sidewalk.

Gerald Buege, 4920 Fieldstone Dr., stated that the back of his house faces River Dr. and requested that speed limit signs be placed in the 4600 block of River Dr. and that the River Dr./Coolidge Ave. intersection be a 3-way stop. Mr. Mahoney stated that his requests will be forwarded to the Town of Plover as well as Village staff for consideration.

Mr. Mahoney interjected that as a safety measure, the Village will be painting a double solid no passing line on the curve of River Dr.

Rick Rossier, 4031 River Dr., questioned the impact of the sidewalk on mailboxes. Mr. Gerland stated that the mailboxes will remain adjacent to the shoulder.

Mr. Davies questioned if other sidewalks have been special assessed in the past. Mr. Mahoney stated that they have not.

Joe Wanserski, 4021 River Dr., questioned a connection of a sidewalk on River Dr. from Foremost Dr. to Post Rd. Mr. Mahoney explained that Foremost Dr. was originally included in the design, but because of the railroad crossing and cost, was taken out. They will be looking at a "safe routes to school program" grant for that area.

Shirley Wanserski, 4021 River Dr., felt that a sidewalk on Foremost Dr. wasn't needed with the Grant Ave. pathway. Mr. Mahoney stated that they are looking at future development and the need for true pedestrian access to the west. He invited the Wanserski's to stay after tonight's meetings to look at a map depicting the sidewalks.

Mark Hackl, 4440 River Dr., questioned who will be responsible for the sidewalk maintenance and liability. Mr. Mahoney stated that the Village will maintain the sidewalks.

Roland Ratchman, 4585 River Dr., questioned the location of the swales. Mr. Mahoney stated that they will be between the sidewalk and the shoulder. The sidewalk will be within 1 foot of the residents' property lines.

Joe Wanserski questioned the elevation of the sidewalk as he is concerned about the effect it will have on the trees, especially oak trees. Mr. Mahoney stated that anyone with concerns specific to their property should give their name and address to him and staff will work with them to minimize any impact the sidewalk will have to their property.

Mr. Fritz asked Mr. Konkol if the Maple Dr. sidewalk is a fair comparison to what the River Dr. sidewalk will be like. Mr. Konkol stated it would be.

Mr. Hackl questioned the total cost of the project. Mr. Mahoney stated that it will be approximately $250,000 with 85% being covered by the TIF district and the remainder from the 2010 Street Reconstruction funding, He explained that the bid prices for asphalt came in under last year's prices. Mr. Mahoney discussed the bonding procedure.

Mr. Davies questioned if there was any opposition to the sidewalk on River Dr. and several people raised their hands.

Mr. Mahoney discussed the safety concerns along River Dr. with the pedestrian/bicycle traffic in conjunction with the vehicular traffic.

Gary Chriske, 4540 River Dr., questioned the installation of street lights on River Dr. Mr. Mahoney explained the procedure of residents in the area requesting street lights, i.e. they would need to obtain a form from the Village and obtain signatures from all of the property owners that would be affected by the street light. It would then be reviewed by staff and, if it met all the criteria, be forwarded to the Village Board for consideration.

Mr. Fritz mentioned that River Dr. was identified as a potential street for a sidewalk when the Pedestrian Walkway Committee was in existence.

RECOMMENDATION TO VILLAGE BOARD: Mr. Damrau moved to accept the recommendation from AECOM and locate the sidewalk on River Dr. between Foremost Dr. and Coolidge Ave. on the south side of River Dr. Mr. Fritz seconded and the motion carried.

6. ROOSEVELT SCHOOL SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS BID
Mr. Mahoney referred to AECOM's letter of recommendation regarding the Roosevelt School Sidewalk Improvements bid, copy attached. He stated that two bids were received with Fahrner Excavating, Inc. submitting the low bid of $41,195, which is recommended for approval.

RECOMMENDATION TO VILLAGE BOARD: Mr. Fritz moved to approve the bid from Fahrner Excavating, Inc. in the amount of $41,195 for the Roosevelt School Sidewalk Improvements project. Mr. Damrau seconded and the motion carried.

7. AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 496, VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC, OF THE VILLAGE OF PLOVER MUNICIPAL CODE OF ORDINANCES - PARKING REGULATIONS ON CHIPPEWA DR. BETWEEN HOOVER AVE. AND BIRCH DR.
Mr. Konkol referred to his report recommending no parking on the south side of Chippewa Dr. between Hoover Ave. and Birch Dr., copy attached.

RECOMMENDATION TO VILLAG BOARD: Mr. Damrau moved to approve the Amendment to Chapter 496, Vehicles and Traffic, of the Village of Plover Municipal Code of Ordinances establishing no parking on the south side of Chippewa Dr. between Hoover Ave. and Birch Dr. Mr. Fritz seconded and the motion carried.

8. REPORTS
a. Public Works Manager
b. Building Manager
The Committee reviewed the Public Works Manager's and Building Manager's reports, copies attached.

Mr. Damrau moved to accept the Public Works Manager's and Building Manager's reports as presented. Mr. Fritz seconded and the motion carried.

9. Mr. Damrau moved to adjourn at 5:37 p.m. Mr. Fritz seconded and the motion carried.

_____________________________________
Karen Swanson, Village Clerk